Sunday, February 21, 2010

Tragedy: Finding the Relatable in the Unrelatable

Tragedy is reality magnified and intensified. It arouses feelings of confusion, pity, sadness, fear, and even delight.

Why do we feel these things after reading tragedies like Oedipus the King? We feel confusion because a certain character does not deserve such a horrible fate. We feel pity for the hopelessness of the situation. We are saddened for the same reason. We are afraid, perhaps, because if something so wretched could happen to this guy, something similar could happen to us, right? We are delighted because a man, a man with his tragic flaw—his pride, his fatal error in life, whatever it may be—is being punished, being put in his place, “getting what he deserves.”
So, our reactions to the play are seemingly justified. But then what is the point of the play? Can we relate to it?

Oedipus’s situation is completely unfamiliar to us. He is a king. When he was born, his parents tied his feet together and left him to die in order to avoid the fulfillment of prophesy. But the prophecies were fulfilled, as they always are, and Oedipus killed his father and married his mother. And Oedipus did not realize he did these things until much later in life. Then, he blinded himself out of self-disgust and sent himself into exile. Can you relate to this? It probably seems like you can’t.

But his prideful and selfish nature, which is evident throughout much of the play, is very relatable. We have all put our concerns before the concerns of others. We have been too proud about our accomplishments. We have been selfish. Oedipus is self-serving. He suffers from hubris. He is self-centered and self-adoring. There are countless examples of his selfishness in the play. One is after learning about the murder of King Laios from Creon, Oedipus immediately worries about himself and says, “Whoever killed King Laios might—who knows?—decided at any moment to kill me as well. By avenging the murdered king I protect myself” (prologue, lines 141-143). These selfish human sentiments are what help us relate to the seemingly unrelatable king.

However, if it seems too impossible to relate to such a tormented man, there is still something valuable to take from Oedipus. This is the ending: the first look at the effects of the tragedy and the reactions of the characters involved. What happens after tragedy/after a tragic flaw or wrongdoing in real life is discovered? Tears, depression, revenge, suicide? Is there ever a “bright side” to the situation or a light at the end of the tunnel? Most certainly. Sometimes such a tragedy is necessary for enlightenment, even if the enlightenment is nearly “terrible,” as described in “Aristotle’s Concept of Tragedy.” At the end of the play, Oedipus is at rock bottom. But his fall humbled him. He is still discouraged and devastated, but there is the slightest glimmer of hope. After his realization that he had, indeed, fulfilled the prophecies, he blinds himself. Through this blinding, he is able to truly see things as they are. A tragedy, but a much-need enlightenment. Sometimes we need to fall—really hard—to go forward.

Because Oedipus’s life is so severely tragic and unlike ours in nearly every way, the messages—the ways we can relate it to our own lives—are not obvious. But once discovered, they are powerful. (559)

7 comments:

  1. Margaret,
    I loved this response! Especially the ending, it is very meaningful and I think you really understood what the play was about. I like your ideas about how the play is not very relatable and is really far-fetched, but once you look into it deeper it is applicable to our lives. I also like your idea that Oedipus is enlightened through his blindness in the end. Good job Margaret!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed how you suggest that, unlike what we had discussed in class, the average person, upon further reflection, can indeed relate to Oedipus. Though he is a king, and in the midst of an unthinkably bizarre and terrible situation, he still demonstrates a multitude of human responses to his situation. When, at the end, he is confronted with such horrible knowledge of what he has done, he takes the only path he sees as possible, to end his life in all but the most basic sense. I think you did an excellent job of showing Oedipus as a human character in a way that we did not really touch upon in class.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Margaret,

    I really enjoyed your take on this play, especially on readers' reaction to the story in addition to the story itself. Your concept of how a person with a life completely different from that of Oedipus can learn from this tragedy was excellent, and I especially like your line about how sometimes tragedy is necessary for enlightenment. You really helped me to understand how this play conforms to some of the seemingly-contradictory aspects of a tragedy.

    Good Job,
    Spenser

    ReplyDelete
  4. Margaret-
    So many things I like about your response, but what I really enjoyed reading about was the part where you state that his fall has humbled him and how there is a glimmer of hope because of it. I completely agree with your take on this, especially when you write, "Sometimes we need to fall—really hard—to go forward." That's such an important concept that I hadn't given much thought to until after reading your blog. I now realize that this concept really pertains to Oedipus and his life as a whole. Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Margaret,
    First of all, this response is EXCELLENT. It encompassed so many elements--tragedy, emotion, Oedipus, characters, etc. Well done! I think that what you mentioned about connecting to the piece details why this play remains so valid in modern times. Although, as you said, we may not know what being a king is like, we can somehow find emotions to connect to. I think is true of most great literature. We may not always see ourselves reflected directly in the piece, but we can find a way to connect to it, to feel it ourselves, find a way to understand. Absolutely great piece!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Margaret,
    I really liked your blog! I agree with your idea that the moral of the story is hard to get, and that the ending is very sad. You should read Ari's blog because she makes some similar points. I think that the average person is naturally unable to make a connection with Oedipus, especially in the beginning. This is because he is not only described as a powerful king, but also because he is described as an incredibly smart man, since he solved the riddle with the sphnix. I think that, in the end, we are able to relate to Oedipus because even he cannot escape fate, something all humans cannot do in ancient greek society. His ultimate surrender to his fate seems to make him more human. But as you said, he still is not totally relatable, since his fate is far worse than that of an average person.
    Really good work!
    Asmit

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello Margaret!!

    I loved reading your blog. It was thoughtful and presented clearly. I definitely agree with you on most of the points you make. You do a good job of debating whether it is possible for the audience to relate to Oedipus or not. I agree that Oedipus's major personality traits are definitely relative to the audience, although his situation may not be. Wonderful!

    Katharine

    ReplyDelete